On March 23rd 1933, 7 days before passover, Hitler passed his enabling act, granting him power as a dictator, bringing forth his personal enforcement army, and eventually committing Genocide on the Jews. On March 23rd 2010, 77 years after Hitler passed his enabling act, 7 days before passover, Obama passed his healthcare bill, granting him great power. tax mandates and penalties included in Obamacare will cause the greatest expansion of the Internal Revenue Service since World War II, But this is far from the end of the story, it gets far worse from here. Before I continue, lets go into full detail of March 23 1933. On March 23, the newly elected Reichstag met in the Kroll Opera House in Berlin to consider passing Hitler's Enabling Act. It was officially called the "Law for Removing the Distress of the People and the Reich." If passed, it would in effect vote democracy out of existence in Germany and establish the legal dictatorship of Adolf Hitler.
Brown-shirted Nazi storm troopers swarmed over the fancy old building in a show of force and as a visible threat. They stood outside, in the hallways and even lined the aisles inside, glaring ominously at anyone who might oppose Hitler's will.
Obama’s “Ready Reserve Corps”
H.R. 3590 – Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act
H. R. 3590—496 (Page 496)SEC. 5210. ESTABLISHING A READY RESERVE CORPS.Section 203 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 204)is amended to read as follows:‘‘SEC. 203. COMMISSIONED CORPS AND READY RESERVE CORPS.‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There shall be in the Service a commissionedRegular Corps and a Ready Reserve Corps for servicein time of national emergency.‘‘(2) REQUIREMENT.—All commissioned officers shall be citizensof the United States and shall be appointed without regardto the civil-service laws and compensated without regard tothe Classification Act of 1923, as amended.‘‘(3) APPOINTMENT.—Commissioned officers of the ReadyReserve Corps shall be appointed by the President and commissionedofficers of the Regular Corps shall be appointed bythe President with the advice and consent of the Senate.‘‘(4) ACTIVE DUTY.—Commissioned officers of the ReadyReserve Corps shall at all times be subject to call to activeduty by the Surgeon General, including active duty for thepurpose of training.‘‘(5) WARRANT OFFICERS.—Warrant officers may beappointed to the Service for the purpose of providing supportto the health and delivery systems maintained by the Serviceand any warrant officer appointed to the Service shall be consideredfor purposes of this Act and title 37, United States Code,to be a commissioned officer within the Commissioned Corpsof the Service.‘‘(b) ASSIMILATING RESERVE CORP OFFICERS INTO THE REGULARCORPS.—Effective on the date of enactment of the Patient Protectionand Affordable Care Act, all individuals classified as officers inthe Reserve Corps under this section (as such section existed onthe day before the date of enactment of such Act) and servingon active duty shall be deemed to be commissioned officers ofthe Regular Corps.‘‘(c) PURPOSE AND USE OF READY RESEARCH.—‘‘(1) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Ready Reserve Corpsis to fulfill the need to have additional Commissioned Corpspersonnel available on short notice (similar to the uniformedservice’s reserve program) to assist regular CommissionedCorps personnel to meet both routine public health and emergencyresponse missions.
‘‘(2) USES.—The Ready Reserve Corps shall—‘‘(A) participate in routine training to meet the generaland specific needs of the Commissioned Corps;‘‘(B) be available and ready for involuntary calls toactive duty during national emergencies and public healthcrises, similar to the uniformed service reserve personnel;
‘‘(C) be available for backfilling critical positions leftvacant during deployment of active duty CommissionedCorps members, as well as for deployment to respond topublic health emergencies, both foreign and domestic; and
‘‘(D) be available for service assignment in isolated,hardship, and medically underserved communities (asdefined in section 799B) to improve access to health services.
H. R. 3590—497‘‘(d) FUNDING.—For the purpose of carrying out the duties andresponsibilities of the Commissioned Corps under this section, thereare authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 for each of fiscalyears 2010 through 2014 for recruitment and training and$12,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014 for theReady Reserve Corps.’’.H. R. 3590—496SEC. 5210. ESTABLISHING A READY RESERVE CORPS.Section 203 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 204)is amended to read as follows:‘‘SEC. 203. COMMISSIONED CORPS AND READY RESERVE CORPS.‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There shall be in the Service a commissionedRegular Corps and a Ready Reserve Corps for servicein time of national emergency.‘‘(2) REQUIREMENT.—All commissioned officers shall be citizensof the United States and shall be appointed without regardto the civil-service laws and compensated without regard tothe Classification Act of 1923, as amended.‘‘(3) APPOINTMENT.—Commissioned officers of the ReadyReserve Corps shall be appointed by the President and commissionedofficers of the Regular Corps shall be appointed bythe President with the advice and consent of the Senate.‘‘(4) ACTIVE DUTY.—Commissioned officers of the ReadyReserve Corps shall at all times be subject to call to activeduty by the Surgeon General, including active duty for thepurpose of training.‘‘(5) WARRANT OFFICERS.—Warrant officers may beappointed to the Service for the purpose of providing supportto the health and delivery systems maintained by the Serviceand any warrant officer appointed to the Service shall be consideredfor purposes of this Act and title 37, United States Code,to be a commissioned officer within the Commissioned Corpsof the Service.‘‘(b) ASSIMILATING RESERVE CORP OFFICERS INTO THE REGULARCORPS.—Effective on the date of enactment of the Patient Protectionand Affordable Care Act, all individuals classified as officers inthe Reserve Corps under this section (as such section existed onthe day before the date of enactment of such Act) and servingon active duty shall be deemed to be commissioned officers ofthe Regular Corps.‘‘(c) PURPOSE AND USE OF READY RESEARCH.—‘‘(1) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Ready Reserve Corpsis to fulfill the need to have additional Commissioned Corpspersonnel available on short notice (similar to the uniformedservice’s reserve program) to assist regular CommissionedCorps personnel to meet both routine public health and emergencyresponse missions.‘‘(2) USES.—The Ready Reserve Corps shall—‘‘(A) participate in routine training to meet the generaland specific needs of the Commissioned Corps;‘‘(B) be available and ready for involuntary calls toactive duty during national emergencies and public healthcrises, similar to the uniformed service reserve personnel;‘‘(C) be available for backfilling critical positions leftvacant during deployment of active duty CommissionedCorps members, as well as for deployment to respond topublic health emergencies, both foreign and domestic; and‘‘(D) be available for service assignment in isolated,hardship, and medically underserved communities (asdefined in section 799B) to improve access to health services.H. R. 3590—497‘‘(d) FUNDING.—For the purpose of carrying out the duties andresponsibilities of the Commissioned Corps under this section, thereare authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 for each of fiscalyears 2010 through 2014 for recruitment and training and$12,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014 for theReady Reserve Corps.’’.
UPDATE:According to World Net Daily:Obamacare prescription: ‘Emergency health army’
Force subject to ‘involuntary calls to active duty’ during ‘public crises’President Obama’s recently passed health-care reform legislation includes a surprise for many Americans – a beefing up of a U.S. Public Health Service reserve force and expectations that it respond on short notice to “routine public health and emergency response missions,” even involuntarily.According to Section 5210 of HR 3590, titled “Establishing a Ready Reserve Corps,” the force must be ready for “involuntary calls to active duty during national emergencies and public health crises.”The health-care legislation adds millions of dollars for recruitment and amends Section 203 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 204),passed July 1, 1944, during Franklin D. Roosevelt’s presidency. The U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps is one of the seven uniformed services in the U.S. However, Obama’s changes more than double the wording of the Section 203 and dub individuals who are currently classified as officers in the Reserve Corps commissioned officers of the Regular Corps.
Obama Snubs Netanyahu at White House
Friday, 26 Mar 2010 10:02 AMArticle Font Size 
By: Dan WeilPresident Obama snubbed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in several ways during his visit to Washington this week.
The White House is upset with Netanyahu’s recent decision to approve Jewish construction in east Jerusalem.
The approval was announced during Vice President Biden’s recent visit to Israel to spark peace negotiations with Palestinians. The Obama administration is miffed by what it sees as Israeli intransigence on this issue.
The White House denied Netanyahu the red carpet treatment generally afforded to visiting heads of state.
The Israeli prime minister and Obama didn’t pose for photos together, and Netanyahu was excluded from dinner with the president Tuesday night.
When Netanyahu wouldn’t agree to concessions, Obama left a meeting with him, though he invited Netanyahu to stay at the White House, talk to Obama advisers and “let me know if there is anything new,” a U.S. congressman who spoke to Netanyahu, told The Times of London.
“It was awful,” the congressman said.
One Israeli newspaper called the meeting “a hazing in stages,” conducted in such an adversarial environment that the Israeli delegation eventually left, worried that their White House phone conversations were being bugged.
Another Israeli paper wrote that Netanyahu received “the treatment reserved for the president of Equatorial Guinea”.
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs quibbled with details of the Israeli accounts but didn’t deny that the White House was sending a message to Netanyahu.
That message: his refusal to freeze construction is the biggest obstacle to resuming peace talks with the Palestinians.
While the two countries are trying to overcome the clash, “the writing is on the wall that Obama and Netanyahu are going to clash on the final status (of the Palestinians),” Robert Malley, director of the International Crisis Group’s Middle East program, told The New York Times.
by Paul Joseph WatsonIf the health care bill was such a positive act of reform, as establishment Democrats and the corporate media are pitching it, then how come it needs to be enforced by means of coercion at the hands of thousands of armed IRS thugs?That was the context of the discussion during Ron Paul’s appearance on Fox Business’ America’s Nightly Scoreboard last night, as the Congressman continued to speak out against the tyrannical nature of Obamacare.Paul emphasized the need to protect the private option in health care as a fundamental right for all Americans not to be reliant on the government for their services.“During this debate they talked a whole lot about the public option, I just wish they would protect the private option, give us a chance to have it private, just like you should have a chance to have private education, home schooling, you should always protect that….if you always had a private option in medicine some of us could survive and at least we could set an example for the type of medicine that the people should be getting,” said the Congressman.Host David Asman pointed out that it would now be illegal to have private health care and that people would be forced to buy insurance under the constant glare of the 16,000 plus new IRS agents being hired to harass people into compliance to the new program.Under Obamacare, $10 billion dollars is allocated to pay for 16,500 IRS agents who will collect and enforce mandatory “premiums.”Paul said that the people who previously needed to carry the least insurance would now be forced to carry the maximum, and be hounded by the IRS as a result.“This is a command society now and medicine is right at the forefront of this….16,500 armed bureaucrats coming to make this program work – if it was a good program and everybody liked it, you wouldn’t need 16,500 thugs coming with their guns and putting you in jail if you didn’t follow all the rules,” said Paul.The Congressman highlighted the fact that people don’t trust the government’s record on social programs, pointing out that Medicare, Medicaid and the Post Office are all bankrupt, and that the majority of Americans have little confidence in Obamacare being any different.Paul said there was a chance parts of the bill would be overturned if Republicans were victorious in November, but that the biggest threat to the legislation was the probability that the entire system would collapse, labeling Obamacare a “Horrendous new burden that we have placed on the economy.”
Thursday, March 18th, 2010The Obama Health care bill under Class II (Paragraph 1, Section B) specifically includes ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable.” Then on page 1004 it describes what the term “data” means in paragraph 1, section B:
14 ‘‘(B) In this paragraph, the term ‘data’ refers to in15
formation respecting a device described in paragraph (1),
16 including claims data, patient survey data, standardized
17 analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of
18 data from disparate data environments, electronic health
19 records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the
20 Secretary”
What exactly is a class II device that is implantable? Lets see…
Approved by the FDA, a class II implantable device is a “implantable radiofrequency
transponder system for patient identification and health information.” The purpose of a class II device is to collect data in medical patients such as “claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary.”
This sort of device would be implanted in the majority of people who opt to become covered by the public health care option. With the reform of the private insurance companies, who charge outrageous rates, many people will switch their coverage to a more affordable insurance plan. This means the number of people who choose the public option will increase. This also means the number of people chipped will be plentiful as well. The adults who choose to have a chip implanted are the lucky (yes, lucky) ones in this case. Children who are “born in the United States who at the time of birth is not otherwise covered under acceptable coverage” will be qualified and placed into the CHIP or Children’s Health Insurance Program (what a convenient name). With a name like CHIP it would seem consistent to have the chip implanted into a child. Children conceived by parents who are already covered under the public option will more than likely be implanted with a chip by the consent of the parent. Eventually everyone will be implanted with a chip. And with the price and coverage of the public option being so competitive with the private companies, the private company may not survive. The Beast intends to control the world and the activities of all humans on the planet with this tracking data chip.
On March 23rd 1933, 7 days before passover, Hitler passed his enabling act, granting him power as a dictator, bringing forth his personal enforcement army, and eventually committing Genocide on the Jews.
On March 23rd 2010, 77 years after Hitler passed his enabling act, 7 days before passover, Obama passed his healthcare bill, granting him great power. tax mandates and penalties included in Obamacare will cause the greatest expansion of the Internal Revenue Service since World War II, But this is far from the end of the story, it gets far worse from here. Before I continue, lets go into full detail of March 23 1933.
On March 23, the newly elected Reichstag met in the Kroll Opera House in Berlin to consider passing Hitler's Enabling Act. It was officially called the "Law for Removing the Distress of the People and the Reich." If passed, it would in effect vote democracy out of existence in Germany and establish the legal dictatorship of Adolf Hitler.
Brown-shirted Nazi storm troopers swarmed over the fancy old building in a show of force and as a visible threat. They stood outside, in the hallways and even lined the aisles inside, glaring ominously at anyone who might oppose Hitler's will.
Obama’s “Ready Reserve Corps”
H.R. 3590 – Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act
H. R. 3590—496 (Page 496)SEC. 5210. ESTABLISHING A READY RESERVE CORPS.Section 203 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 204)is amended to read as follows:‘‘SEC. 203. COMMISSIONED CORPS AND READY RESERVE CORPS.‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There shall be in the Service a commissionedRegular Corps and a Ready Reserve Corps for servicein time of national emergency.‘‘(2) REQUIREMENT.—All commissioned officers shall be citizensof the United States and shall be appointed without regardto the civil-service laws and compensated without regard tothe Classification Act of 1923, as amended.‘‘(3) APPOINTMENT.—Commissioned officers of the ReadyReserve Corps shall be appointed by the President and commissionedofficers of the Regular Corps shall be appointed bythe President with the advice and consent of the Senate.‘‘(4) ACTIVE DUTY.—Commissioned officers of the ReadyReserve Corps shall at all times be subject to call to activeduty by the Surgeon General, including active duty for thepurpose of training.‘‘(5) WARRANT OFFICERS.—Warrant officers may beappointed to the Service for the purpose of providing supportto the health and delivery systems maintained by the Serviceand any warrant officer appointed to the Service shall be consideredfor purposes of this Act and title 37, United States Code,to be a commissioned officer within the Commissioned Corpsof the Service.‘‘(b) ASSIMILATING RESERVE CORP OFFICERS INTO THE REGULARCORPS.—Effective on the date of enactment of the Patient Protectionand Affordable Care Act, all individuals classified as officers inthe Reserve Corps under this section (as such section existed onthe day before the date of enactment of such Act) and servingon active duty shall be deemed to be commissioned officers ofthe Regular Corps.‘‘(c) PURPOSE AND USE OF READY RESEARCH.—‘‘(1) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Ready Reserve Corpsis to fulfill the need to have additional Commissioned Corpspersonnel available on short notice (similar to the uniformedservice’s reserve program) to assist regular CommissionedCorps personnel to meet both routine public health and emergencyresponse missions.‘‘(2) USES.—The Ready Reserve Corps shall—‘‘(A) participate in routine training to meet the generaland specific needs of the Commissioned Corps;‘‘(B) be available and ready for involuntary calls toactive duty during national emergencies and public healthcrises, similar to the uniformed service reserve personnel;‘‘(C) be available for backfilling critical positions leftvacant during deployment of active duty CommissionedCorps members, as well as for deployment to respond topublic health emergencies, both foreign and domestic; and‘‘(D) be available for service assignment in isolated,hardship, and medically underserved communities (asdefined in section 799B) to improve access to health services.H. R. 3590—497‘‘(d) FUNDING.—For the purpose of carrying out the duties andresponsibilities of the Commissioned Corps under this section, thereare authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 for each of fiscalyears 2010 through 2014 for recruitment and training and$12,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014 for theReady Reserve Corps.’’.H. R. 3590—496SEC. 5210. ESTABLISHING A READY RESERVE CORPS.Section 203 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 204)is amended to read as follows:‘‘SEC. 203. COMMISSIONED CORPS AND READY RESERVE CORPS.‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There shall be in the Service a commissionedRegular Corps and a Ready Reserve Corps for servicein time of national emergency.‘‘(2) REQUIREMENT.—All commissioned officers shall be citizensof the United States and shall be appointed without regardto the civil-service laws and compensated without regard tothe Classification Act of 1923, as amended.‘‘(3) APPOINTMENT.—Commissioned officers of the ReadyReserve Corps shall be appointed by the President and commissionedofficers of the Regular Corps shall be appointed bythe President with the advice and consent of the Senate.‘‘(4) ACTIVE DUTY.—Commissioned officers of the ReadyReserve Corps shall at all times be subject to call to activeduty by the Surgeon General, including active duty for thepurpose of training.‘‘(5) WARRANT OFFICERS.—Warrant officers may beappointed to the Service for the purpose of providing supportto the health and delivery systems maintained by the Serviceand any warrant officer appointed to the Service shall be consideredfor purposes of this Act and title 37, United States Code,to be a commissioned officer within the Commissioned Corpsof the Service.‘‘(b) ASSIMILATING RESERVE CORP OFFICERS INTO THE REGULARCORPS.—Effective on the date of enactment of the Patient Protectionand Affordable Care Act, all individuals classified as officers inthe Reserve Corps under this section (as such section existed onthe day before the date of enactment of such Act) and servingon active duty shall be deemed to be commissioned officers ofthe Regular Corps.‘‘(c) PURPOSE AND USE OF READY RESEARCH.—‘‘(1) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Ready Reserve Corpsis to fulfill the need to have additional Commissioned Corpspersonnel available on short notice (similar to the uniformedservice’s reserve program) to assist regular CommissionedCorps personnel to meet both routine public health and emergencyresponse missions.‘‘(2) USES.—The Ready Reserve Corps shall—‘‘(A) participate in routine training to meet the generaland specific needs of the Commissioned Corps;‘‘(B) be available and ready for involuntary calls toactive duty during national emergencies and public healthcrises, similar to the uniformed service reserve personnel;‘‘(C) be available for backfilling critical positions leftvacant during deployment of active duty CommissionedCorps members, as well as for deployment to respond topublic health emergencies, both foreign and domestic; and‘‘(D) be available for service assignment in isolated,hardship, and medically underserved communities (asdefined in section 799B) to improve access to health services.H. R. 3590—497‘‘(d) FUNDING.—For the purpose of carrying out the duties andresponsibilities of the Commissioned Corps under this section, thereare authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 for each of fiscalyears 2010 through 2014 for recruitment and training and$12,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014 for theReady Reserve Corps.’’.
UPDATE:
According to World Net Daily:
Obamacare prescription: ‘Emergency health army’
Force subject to ‘involuntary calls to active duty’ during ‘public crises’
President Obama’s recently passed health-care reform legislation includes a surprise for many Americans – a beefing up of a U.S. Public Health Service reserve force and expectations that it respond on short notice to “routine public health and emergency response missions,” even involuntarily.According to Section 5210 of HR 3590, titled “Establishing a Ready Reserve Corps,” the force must be ready for “involuntary calls to active duty during national emergencies and public health crises.”The health-care legislation adds millions of dollars for recruitment and amends Section 203 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 204),passed July 1, 1944, during Franklin D. Roosevelt’s presidency. The U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps is one of the seven uniformed services in the U.S. However, Obama’s changes more than double the wording of the Section 203 and dub individuals who are currently classified as officers in the Reserve Corps commissioned officers of the Regular Corps.Obama Snubs Netanyahu at White House
Friday, 26 Mar 2010 10:02 AMArticle Font SizeBy: Dan WeilPresident Obama snubbed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in several ways during his visit to Washington this week.
The White House is upset with Netanyahu’s recent decision to approve Jewish construction in east Jerusalem.
The approval was announced during Vice President Biden’s recent visit to Israel to spark peace negotiations with Palestinians. The Obama administration is miffed by what it sees as Israeli intransigence on this issue.
The White House denied Netanyahu the red carpet treatment generally afforded to visiting heads of state.
The Israeli prime minister and Obama didn’t pose for photos together, and Netanyahu was excluded from dinner with the president Tuesday night.
When Netanyahu wouldn’t agree to concessions, Obama left a meeting with him, though he invited Netanyahu to stay at the White House, talk to Obama advisers and “let me know if there is anything new,” a U.S. congressman who spoke to Netanyahu, told The Times of London.
“It was awful,” the congressman said.
One Israeli newspaper called the meeting “a hazing in stages,” conducted in such an adversarial environment that the Israeli delegation eventually left, worried that their White House phone conversations were being bugged.
Another Israeli paper wrote that Netanyahu received “the treatment reserved for the president of Equatorial Guinea”.
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs quibbled with details of the Israeli accounts but didn’t deny that the White House was sending a message to Netanyahu.
That message: his refusal to freeze construction is the biggest obstacle to resuming peace talks with the Palestinians.
While the two countries are trying to overcome the clash, “the writing is on the wall that Obama and Netanyahu are going to clash on the final status (of the Palestinians),” Robert Malley, director of the International Crisis Group’s Middle East program, told The New York Times.
by Paul Joseph Watson
If the health care bill was such a positive act of reform, as establishment Democrats and the corporate media are pitching it, then how come it needs to be enforced by means of coercion at the hands of thousands of armed IRS thugs?
That was the context of the discussion during Ron Paul’s appearance on Fox Business’ America’s Nightly Scoreboard last night, as the Congressman continued to speak out against the tyrannical nature of Obamacare.
Paul emphasized the need to protect the private option in health care as a fundamental right for all Americans not to be reliant on the government for their services.
“During this debate they talked a whole lot about the public option, I just wish they would protect the private option, give us a chance to have it private, just like you should have a chance to have private education, home schooling, you should always protect that….if you always had a private option in medicine some of us could survive and at least we could set an example for the type of medicine that the people should be getting,” said the Congressman.
Host David Asman pointed out that it would now be illegal to have private health care and that people would be forced to buy insurance under the constant glare of the 16,000 plus new IRS agents being hired to harass people into compliance to the new program.
Under Obamacare, $10 billion dollars is allocated to pay for 16,500 IRS agents who will collect and enforce mandatory “premiums.”
Paul said that the people who previously needed to carry the least insurance would now be forced to carry the maximum, and be hounded by the IRS as a result.
“This is a command society now and medicine is right at the forefront of this….16,500 armed bureaucrats coming to make this program work – if it was a good program and everybody liked it, you wouldn’t need 16,500 thugs coming with their guns and putting you in jail if you didn’t follow all the rules,” said Paul.
The Congressman highlighted the fact that people don’t trust the government’s record on social programs, pointing out that Medicare, Medicaid and the Post Office are all bankrupt, and that the majority of Americans have little confidence in Obamacare being any different.
Paul said there was a chance parts of the bill would be overturned if Republicans were victorious in November, but that the biggest threat to the legislation was the probability that the entire system would collapse, labeling Obamacare a “Horrendous new burden that we have placed on the economy.”
formation respecting a device described in paragraph (1),
16 including claims data, patient survey data, standardized
17 analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of
18 data from disparate data environments, electronic health
19 records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the
20 Secretary”
What exactly is a class II device that is implantable? Lets see…
Approved by the FDA, a class II implantable device is a “implantable radiofrequency
transponder system for patient identification and health information.” The purpose of a class II device is to collect data in medical patients such as “claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary.”
This sort of device would be implanted in the majority of people who opt to become covered by the public health care option. With the reform of the private insurance companies, who charge outrageous rates, many people will switch their coverage to a more affordable insurance plan. This means the number of people who choose the public option will increase. This also means the number of people chipped will be plentiful as well. The adults who choose to have a chip implanted are the lucky (yes, lucky) ones in this case. Children who are “born in the United States who at the time of birth is not otherwise covered under acceptable coverage” will be qualified and placed into the CHIP or Children’s Health Insurance Program (what a convenient name). With a name like CHIP it would seem consistent to have the chip implanted into a child. Children conceived by parents who are already covered under the public option will more than likely be implanted with a chip by the consent of the parent. Eventually everyone will be implanted with a chip. And with the price and coverage of the public option being so competitive with the private companies, the private company may not survive. The Beast intends to control the world and the activities of all humans on the planet with this tracking data chip.
Obama Snubs Netanyahu at White House
Friday, 26 Mar 2010 10:02 AM
Article Font Size
By: Dan Weil
President Obama snubbed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in several ways during his visit to Washington this week.
The White House is upset with Netanyahu’s recent decision to approve Jewish construction in east Jerusalem.
The approval was announced during Vice President Biden’s recent visit to Israel to spark peace negotiations with Palestinians. The Obama administration is miffed by what it sees as Israeli intransigence on this issue.
The White House denied Netanyahu the red carpet treatment generally afforded to visiting heads of state.
The Israeli prime minister and Obama didn’t pose for photos together, and Netanyahu was excluded from dinner with the president Tuesday night.
When Netanyahu wouldn’t agree to concessions, Obama left a meeting with him, though he invited Netanyahu to stay at the White House, talk to Obama advisers and “let me know if there is anything new,” a U.S. congressman who spoke to Netanyahu, told The Times of London.
“It was awful,” the congressman said.
One Israeli newspaper called the meeting “a hazing in stages,” conducted in such an adversarial environment that the Israeli delegation eventually left, worried that their White House phone conversations were being bugged.
Another Israeli paper wrote that Netanyahu received “the treatment reserved for the president of Equatorial Guinea”.
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs quibbled with details of the Israeli accounts but didn’t deny that the White House was sending a message to Netanyahu.
That message: his refusal to freeze construction is the biggest obstacle to resuming peace talks with the Palestinians.
While the two countries are trying to overcome the clash, “the writing is on the wall that Obama and Netanyahu are going to clash on the final status (of the Palestinians),” Robert Malley, director of the International Crisis Group’s Middle East program, told The New York Times.
The White House is upset with Netanyahu’s recent decision to approve Jewish construction in east Jerusalem.
The approval was announced during Vice President Biden’s recent visit to Israel to spark peace negotiations with Palestinians. The Obama administration is miffed by what it sees as Israeli intransigence on this issue.
The White House denied Netanyahu the red carpet treatment generally afforded to visiting heads of state.
The Israeli prime minister and Obama didn’t pose for photos together, and Netanyahu was excluded from dinner with the president Tuesday night.
When Netanyahu wouldn’t agree to concessions, Obama left a meeting with him, though he invited Netanyahu to stay at the White House, talk to Obama advisers and “let me know if there is anything new,” a U.S. congressman who spoke to Netanyahu, told The Times of London.
“It was awful,” the congressman said.
One Israeli newspaper called the meeting “a hazing in stages,” conducted in such an adversarial environment that the Israeli delegation eventually left, worried that their White House phone conversations were being bugged.
Another Israeli paper wrote that Netanyahu received “the treatment reserved for the president of Equatorial Guinea”.
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs quibbled with details of the Israeli accounts but didn’t deny that the White House was sending a message to Netanyahu.
That message: his refusal to freeze construction is the biggest obstacle to resuming peace talks with the Palestinians.
While the two countries are trying to overcome the clash, “the writing is on the wall that Obama and Netanyahu are going to clash on the final status (of the Palestinians),” Robert Malley, director of the International Crisis Group’s Middle East program, told The New York Times.
Obama Offered Deal to Russia in Secret Letter
WASHINGTON — President Obama sent a secret letter to Russia’s president last month suggesting that he would back off deploying a new missile defense system in Eastern Europe if Moscow would help stop Iran from developing long-range weapons, American officials said Monday.
Dmitry Astakhov/RIA Novosti, via Associated Press
The letter was hand-delivered to President Dmitri A. Medvedev, above, three weeks ago.
Readers' Comments
Readers shared their thoughts on this article.
The officials who described the contents of the message requested anonymity because it has not been made public. While they said it did not offer a direct quid pro quo, the letter was intended to give Moscow an incentive to join the United States in a common front against Iran. Russia’s military, diplomatic and commercial ties to Tehran give it some influence there, but it has often resisted Washington’s hard line against Iran.
“It’s almost saying to them, put up or shut up,” said a senior administration official. “It’s not that the Russians get to say, ‘We’ll try and therefore you have to suspend.’ It says the threat has to go away.”
On Tuesday, a press secretary for Dmitri A. Medvedev told the Interfax news agency that the letter did not contain any “specific proposals or mutually binding initiatives.”
Natalya Timakova said the letter was a reply to one sent by Mr. Medvedev shortly after Mr. Obama was elected.
“Medvedev appreciated the promptness of the reply and the positive spirit of the message,” Ms. Timakova said. “Obama’s letter contains various proposals and assessments of the current situation. But the message did not contain any specific proposals or mutually binding initiatives.”
She said Mr. Medvedev perceives the development of Russian-American relations as “exceptionally positive,” and hopes details can be fleshed out at a meeting on Friday in Geneva between Foreign Minister Sergei V. Lavrov and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Mr. Obama and Mr. Medvedev will meet for the first time on April 2 in London, officials said Monday.
Mr. Obama’s letter, sent in response to one he received from Mr. Medvedev shortly after Mr. Obama’s inauguration, is part of an effort to “press the reset button” on Russian-American relations, as Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. put it last month, officials in Washington said. Among other things, the letter discussed talks to extend a strategic arms treaty expiring this year and cooperation in opening supply routes to Afghanistan.
The plan to build a high-tech radar facility in the Czech Republic and deploy 10 interceptor missiles in Poland — a part of the world that Russia once considered its sphere of influence — was a top priority for President George W. Bush to deter Iran in case it developed a nuclear warhead to fit atop its long-range missiles. Mr. Bush never accepted a Moscow proposal to install part of the missile defense system on its territory and jointly operate it so it could not be used against Russia.
Now the Obama administration appears to be reconsidering that idea, although it is not clear if it would want to put part of the system on Russian soil where it could be flipped on or off by Russians. Mr. Obama has been lukewarm on missile defense, saying he supports it only if it can be proved technically effective and affordable.
Mr. Bush also emphasized the linkage between the Iranian threat and missile defense, but Mr. Obama’s overture reformulates it in a way intended to appeal to the Russians, who long ago soured on the Bush administration. Officials have been hinting at the possibility of an agreement in recent weeks, and Mr. Obama’s proposal was reported on Monday by a Moscow newspaper, Kommersant.
“If through strong diplomacy with Russia and our other partners we can reduce or eliminate that threat, it obviously shapes the way at which we look at missile defense,” Under Secretary of State William J. Burns said about the Iranian threat in an interview with the Russian news agency Interfax while in Moscow last month delivering Mr. Obama’s letter.
Attending a NATO meeting in Krakow, Poland, on Feb. 20, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said, “I told the Russians a year ago that if there were no Iranian missile program, there would be no need for the missile sites.” Mr. Obama’s inauguration, he added, offered the chance for a fresh start. “My hope is that now, with the new administration, the prospects for that kind of cooperation might have improved,” he said.
The idea has distressed Poland and the Czech Republic, where leaders invested political capital in signing missile defense cooperation treaties with the United States despite domestic opposition. If the United States were to slow or halt deployment of the systems, Warsaw and Prague might insist on other incentives.
For example, the deal with Poland included a side agreement that an American Patriot air defense battery would be moved from Germany to Poland, where it would be operated by a crew of about 100 American service members. The administration might have to proceed with that to reassure Warsaw.
Missile defense has flavored Mr. Obama’s relationship with Russia from the day after his election, when Mr. Medvedev threatened to point missiles at Europe if the system proceeded. Mr. Medvedev later backed off that threat and it seems that Moscow is taking seriously the idea floated in Mr. Obama’s letter. Kommersant, the Moscow newspaper, on Monday called it a “sensational proposal.”
Mr. Medvedev said Sunday that he believed the Obama administration would be open to cooperation on missile defense.
“We have already received such signals from our American colleagues,” he said in an interview posted on the Kremlin Web site. “I expect that these signals will turn into concrete proposals. I hope to discuss this issue of great importance for Europe during my first meeting with President Barack Obama.”
Obama Is Said to Consider Preventive Detention Plan
WASHINGTON — President Obama told human rights advocates at the White House on Wednesday that he was mulling the need for a “preventive detention” system that would establish a legal basis for the United States to incarcerate terrorism suspects who are deemed a threat to national security but cannot be tried, two participants in the private session said.Blog
The Caucus
The latest on President Obama, the new administration and other news from Washington and around the nation. Join the discussion.
The discussion, in a 90-minute meeting in the Cabinet Room that included Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. and other top administration officials, came on the eve of a much-anticipated speech Mr. Obama is to give Thursday on a number of thorny national security matters, including his promise to close the detention center at the naval base in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.
Human rights advocates are growing deeply uneasy with Mr. Obama’s stance on these issues, especially his recent move to block the release of photographs showing abuse of detainees, and his announcement that he is willing to try terrorism suspects in military commissions — a concept he criticized bitterly as a presidential candidate.
The two participants, outsiders who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the session was intended to be off the record, said they left the meeting dismayed.
They said Mr. Obama told them he was thinking about “the long game” — how to establish a legal system that would endure for future presidents. He raised the issue of preventive detention himself, but made clear that he had not made a decision on it. Several senior White House officials did not respond to requests for comment on the outsiders’ accounts.
“He was almost ruminating over the need for statutory change to the laws so that we can deal with individuals who we can’t charge and detain,” one participant said. “We’ve known this is on the horizon for many years, but we were able to hold it off with George Bush. The idea that we might find ourselves fighting with the Obama administration over these powers is really stunning.”
The other participant said Mr. Obama did not seem to be thinking about preventive detention for terrorism suspects now held at Guantánamo Bay, but rather for those captured in the future, in settings other than a legitimate battlefield like Afghanistan. “The issue is,” the participant said, “What are the options left open to a future president?”
Mr. Obama did not specify how he intended to deal with Guantánamo detainees who posed a threat and could not be tried, nor did he share the contents of Thursday’s speech, the participants said.
He will deliver the speech at a site laden with symbolism — the National Archives, home to the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. Across town, his biggest Republican critic, former Vice President Dick Cheney, will deliver a speech at theAmerican Enterprise Institute.
Mr. Cheney and other hawkish critics have sought to portray Mr. Obama as weak on terror, and their argument seems to be catching on with the public. On Tuesday, Senate Democrats, in a clear rebuke to the White House, blocked the $80 million Mr. Obama had requested in financing to close the Guantánamo prison.
The lawmakers say they want a detailed plan before releasing the money; there is deep opposition on Capitol Hill to housing terrorism suspects inside the United States.
“He needs to convince people that he’s got a game plan that will protect us as well as be fair to the detainees,” said Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, who agrees with Mr. Obama that the prison should be closed. “If he can do that, then we’re back on track. But if he doesn’t make that case, then we’ve lost control of this debate.”
But Mr. Obama will not use the speech to provide the details lawmakers want.
“What it’s not going to be is a prescriptive speech,” said David Axelrod, Mr. Obama’s senior adviser. “The president wants to take some time and put this whole issue in perspective to identify what the challenges are and how he will approach dealing with them.”A Department of Homeland Security intelligence assessment equates Christians who believe in “end times prophecies” with violent terrorists and states that radical extremists are “stockpiling” food in fear of Obama administration regulations that may facilitate the occurrence of prophesied events.This newly uncovered document is just the latest in a long sordid line of training manuals in which the federal government characterizes tens of millions of American citizens as potentially violent terrorists who are a threat to law enforcement. The document is titled:Right Wing Extremism. It states, in part:“Antigovernment conspiracy theories and “end times” prophecies could motivate extremist individuals and groups to stockpile food, ammunition, and weapons.”Simply put, any Christian who believes in the end times prophecy of the Second Coming of Christ would be labeled as a terrorist. In addition, anyone who has a food storage is now labeled as a terrorist.This is among the first of many attacks to come against Christians by the Socialist Obama Administration! Perhaps this might be why the General Authorities have stopped telling people to get a food storage?Related Posts:
Posts
